| Municipal Performance
Measurement Program
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Local Government
|
1.
OPERATING COSTS
General government support |
|
Operating costs for
general government support_ x100
Total Municipal Operating Costs |
|
16.3% of total municipal operating costs |
|
Efficiency Measure
General government support as a percentage of total municipal
operating costs.
Objective
Efficient municipal administration. |
|
Notes
The municipality’s operating costs for general government
support totalled $179,377 in the year 2001.
|
| |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Fire Services
|
2.
OPERATING COSTS |
|
Operating costs for Fire Services
(Total assessment / 1,000) |
|
$00.36 per $1,000 of assessment |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for fire services per $1,000 of assessment.
Objective
Efficient municipal fire services.
|
|
Notes
This municipality operates a volunteer fire service. The
operating cost of this service for a home assessed at $100,000 was
approximately $36 in the year 2001.
|
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Police Services
|
3. OPERATING
COSTS |
4.
TOTAL CRIME RATE/ 1,000 |
|
|
Operating costs for Police Services
Total households
|
Total # of actual incidents for violent crime, property
crime and other Criminal Code offences
Population / 1,000 |
|
$109.32 per household |
15.5 crimes per 1,000 persons |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for police services per household.
Objective
Efficient municipal police services. |
Effectiveness Measure
Total crime rate per 1,000 persons
(Criminal Code, excluding traffic).
Note that the Statistics Canada definition used refers to
Criminal Code crimes, excluding traffic.
Objective
Safe communities. |
|
Notes
Policing services are provided by the Ontario Provincial Police. |
Notes
A total of 17 actual incidents occurred 1n 2001. |
| |
|
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Road Services
|
5. OPERATING
COSTS FOR PAVED ROADS |
6. OPERATING
COSTS FOR UNPAVED ROADS |
|
Operating costs for paved roads
Total paved lane kilometres |
Operating costs for unpaved roads
Total unpaved lane kilometres |
|
$95.15 per paved lane kilometre |
$309.77 per unpaved lane kilometre |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for paved (hard top) roads per lane kilometre.
Objective
Efficient maintenance of paved roads. |
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for unpaved (loose top) roads per lane kilometre.
Objective
Efficient maintenance of unpaved roads.
|
|
Notes
The cost of road maintenance in this municipality in 2001 was
about $190 each kilometre of two lane paved road. |
Notes
The cost of road maintenance in this municipality in 2001 was
about $620 for each kilometre of two lane unpaved road. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Road Services
|
7. OPERATING COSTS FOR
WINTER CONTROL |
8. CONDITION OF ROADS |
|
Operating costs for winter control maintenance of
roadways
Total lane kilometres maintained in winter |
Number of paved lane kilometres rated as good
to very good x100
Total number of paved lane kilometres tested |
|
$142.44 per lane kilometre |
91.3% of lane kilometres |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for winter control maintenance of roadways per
lane kilometre.
Objective
Efficient winter control operation.
|
Effectiveness Measure
Percentage of paved lane kilometres where condition is rated as
good to very good.
Objective
Provide a paved lane system that has a pavement condition that
meets municipal standards.
|
|
Notes
During the year 2001 it cost this municipality about $285 to
provide winter maintenance (plow, sand, etc.) each kilometre of two
lane road. |
Notes
The large majority of paved roads in this municipality in 2001
were considered to be in good to very good condition. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Road Services
|
9. WINTER EVENT RESPONSES |
|
Number of winter event responses
that met or exceeded municipal road maintenance
standards x100
Total number of winter events |
|
100.0% of winter event responses |
|
Effectiveness
Percentage of winter event responses that met or exceeded
municipal road maintenance standards.
Objective
Provide appropriate winter response.
|
|
Notes
The municipality recognizes the Ontario Good Roads Association
standards for plowing, sanding and salting roads and met those
standards at all times during the year 2001. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Transit Services
|
10.
OPERATING COSTS |
11. PUBLIC
TRANSIT USE |
|
Operating costs for conventional transit
Total number of regular service passenger trips |
Total number of conventional transit passenger
trips in service area in a year
Population of service area |
|
NOT APPLICABLE |
NOT APPLICABLE |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for conventional transit per regular service
passenger trip.
Objective
Efficient municipal transit services.
|
Effectiveness Measure
Number of conventional transit passenger trips per person in the
service area in a year.
Objective
Maximum utilization of municipal transit services. |
|
Notes
This municipality does not provide public transit services.
|
Notes
This municipality does not provide public transit services. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Wastewater
|
12. OPERATING
COSTS FOR COLLECTION TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL |
13. MAIN
BACKUPS BA |
|
Operating costs for wastewater collection,
treatment and disposal
Total megalitres of wastewater treated |
Total number of backed up wastewater mains
Total kilometres of wastewater mains /100 |
|
$952.85 per megalitre |
0 per 100 kilometres of main |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for collection, treatment, and disposal of
wastewater per megalitre.
A megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or 1,000 cubic metres.
Objective
Efficient wastewater services.
|
Effectiveness Measure
Number of wastewater main backups per 100 kilometres of
wastewater main in a year.
Objective
Prevention of human and environmental health hazards. |
|
Notes
The cost of sewage collection and treatment reflects the limited
number of properties receiving this service. |
Notes
No wastewater backups were reported in 2001. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Wastewater
|
14. TREATMENT BYPASS |
|
Estimated megalitres of untreated wastewater x100
Total megalitres of wastewater, including
treated and untreated |
|
0.0% of wastewater |
|
Effectiveness Measures
Percentage of wastewater estimated to have by-passed treatment.
A megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or 1,000 cubic metres.
Objective
Effective wastewater and treatment and disposal services.
_______________________________________________
Notes
No wastewater by-passed treatment during the year 2001
|
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Water Services
|
15. OPERATING
COSTS
FOR TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTION |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for the treatment and distribution of water per
megalitre (Integrated System).
A megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres, or 1,000 cubic metres.
Objective
Efficient production and distribution of water.
|
|
Notes
The cost of water treatment and distribution reflects the limited
number of properties receiving this service. |
| |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Water Services
|
16. BREAKS
IN WATER MAINS |
17. BOIL WATER ADVISORIES |
|
Number of breaks in water mains
Total kilometres of water main pipe / 100
|
Summation of: number of boil water advisory days
times the number of affected connections
Total connections in service area |
|
0 breaks per 100 kilometres of main |
0 days a year |
|
Effectiveness Measure
Number of breaks in water mains per 100 kilometres of water main
pipe in a year.
Objective
Improve system reliability and minimize water loss and
operational costs. |
Effectiveness Measure
Weighted number of days when a boil water advisory issued by the
Medical Officer of Health, applicable to a municipal water supply,
was in effect.
Objective
Water is safe and meets local needs.
|
|
Notes
There were no breaks in watermains during the year 2001 |
Notes
There were no boil water advisories during the year 2001.
|
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Solid Waste
|
18.
OPERATING COSTS
FOR DISPOSAL |
|
Operating costs for solid waste disposal
Total tonnes disposed from all property classes OR
total households |
|
$21.89 per household |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for garbage disposal per tonne or per household.
Objective
Efficient disposal of solid waste. |
|
Notes
Tonnage figures are not available for solid waste disposal in
this municipality. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Solid Waste
|
19. OPERATING
COSTS
FOR DIVERSION |
20. OPERATING COSTS
FOR INTEGRATED SYSTEM |
|
Operating costs for solid waste diversion
Total tonnes diverted OR total households
|
Operating costs for solid waste management
Total tonnes disposed of and total tonnes diverted
OR total households |
|
$44.45 per tonne |
NOT APPLICABLE |
|
Efficiency Measure
Operating costs for solid waste diversion (recycling) per tonne
or per household.
Objective
Waste programs divert garbage from landfills and incinerators. |
Efficiency Measure
Average operating costs for solid waste management (collection,
disposal and diversion) per tonne or per household.
Objective
Efficient solid waste management programs.
|
|
Notes
This municipality began participating in a joint recycling
program with a number of area municipalities in June, 2001. The cost
shown is based on this municipality’s estimated share of the total
waste diverted under that program. |
Notes
This municipality does not provide garbage collection service.
|
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Solid Waste
|
21a . FACILITY
COMPLIANCE |
21b. NUMBER
OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SITES |
22. COMPLAINTS
FOR SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION |
|
Total number of days per year MOE compliance order
was in effect |
Total number of waste management sites |
Number of Complaints
Total Households / 1,000 |
|
0 days |
1 sites |
0 complaints per 1,000 households |
|
Effectiveness Measure
Number of days per year when a Ministry of Environment compliance
order for remediation concerning an air or groundwater standard was
in effect for a solid waste management facility, by site.
Objective
Municipal solid waste services do not have an adverse affect on
environment.
|
Effectiveness Measure
Total number of solid waste management sites owned by
municipality.
Objective
Effective management of solid waste. |
Effectiveness Measure
Number of complaints received in a year concerning the collection
of solid waste and recycled materials per 1,000 households.
Objective
Effective waste management services. |
|
Notes
There were no MOE compliance orders issued in 2001. |
Notes
This municipality owns and operates only one solid waste disposal
site. |
Notes
No complaints were filed in 2001. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Solid Waste
|
23.
DIVERSION OF SOLID WASTE |
|
Total tonnes of residential waste diverted x100
Total tonnes of residential solid waste disposed
of
and total tonnes diverted |
|
NOT AVAILABLE |
|
Effectiveness Measure
Percentage of residential solid waste diverted.
Objective
Municipal waste programs divert garbage from landfills and
incinerators. |
|
Notes
Approximately 16.5 tonnes of solid waste is estimated to have
been diverted in 2001, however tonnages for undiverted waste are not
available. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Land Use Planning
|
24. GROWTH AND SETTLEMENT PATTERN |
|
Number of new lots, blocks and / or units with
final
approval which are located within the
settlement area x100
Total number of new lots, blocks and / or units
with final approval within entire municipality
|
|
0.0% of new development |
|
Effectiveness Measure
Percentage of new development with final approval which is
located within settlement areas.
Objective
New lot creation is occurring in settlement areas.
|
|
Notes
There were no new lots created within the settlement area of
Richards Landing in the year 2001. |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Land Use Planning
|
25a. PRESERVATION
OF AGRICULTURAL LAND IN REPORTING YEAR |
25b. CHANGE
IN NUMBER OF DESIGNATED HECTARES IN REPORTING YEAR |
|
Hectares of land designated for agricultural
purposes
in the Official Plan as of December 31, 2001
X100
Hectares of land designated for agricultural
purposes in the Official Plan as of January 1,
2001
|
Number of hectares of land originally designated
for agricultural purposes which was re-designated for other uses
during 2001. |
|
NOT APPLICABLE |
NOT APPLICABLE |
|
Effectiveness Measure
Percentage of land designated for agricultural purposes which was
preserved during 2001.
Objective
Preserve agricultural land. |
Effectiveness Measure
Number of hectares of land originally designated for agricultural
purposes which was re-designated for other uses during 2001.
Objective
Preserve agricultural land.
|
|
Notes
There is no agricultural land use designation in the official
plan of this municipality. |
Notes
There is no agricultural land use designation in this
municipality |
Township of St. Joseph • Year 2001 Report
Land Use Planning
|
25c . AGRICULTURAL
LAND RELATIVE TO BASE YEAR |
25d. REDESIGNATED
AGRICULTURAL LAND |
|
Hectares of land designated for agricultural
purposes
in the Official Plan as of December 31, 2001
X100
Hectares of land designated for agricultural
purposes in the Official Plan as of January 1,
2000
|
Number of hectares of land originally designated
for agricultural purposes which was re-designated for other uses
relative to base year.
|
|
NOT APPLICABLE |
NOT APPLICABLE |
|
Effectiveness Measure
Percentage of land designated for agricultural purposes which was
preserved relative to base year of 2000.
Objective
Preserve agricultural land. |
Effectiveness Measure
Number of hectares of land originally designated for agricultural
purposes which was re-designated for other uses since January 1,
2000.
Objective
Preserve agricultural land.
|
|
Notes
There is no agricultural land use designation in the official
plan of this municipality.
|
Notes
There is no agricultural land use designation in this
municipality.
|
|